cowardly silence about that assault, I pointed out here since day one, was finally broken. Given the university's decision to expel Geisy, the Ministry of Education sent a request for information to Uniban, the Special Secretariat for Women's fired public prosecutors to investigate crimes against human rights, political parties, parliamentarians, OAB and UNE also spoken. I am pleased with the reaction, but I never tire of pointing out: came late. The original occurrence was already extremely serious. It took the humiliation to come to the refinement that we agree. Reinaldo Azevedo
In full:
Geisy, repeal THE EXPULSION, lynching LANGUAGE, THE CRIME AND DIGNITY to Mr Vicente Paulo da Silva (SP), the notorious Vicentinho, PT, decided to make an appearance. It is considered the largest in Uniban formed personality - who was poster boy along with another PT, Luiz Marinho, current mayor of St. Bernard, city \u200b\u200bthat is the unit that staged the spectacle depressing. Pinto, who has been vice Paulo Maluf when he disputed the government of Sao Paulo in 2002, was once tipped to Vicentinho's deputy when the deputy tried, unsuccessfully, for mayor of St. Bernard in 2004. Then quit. But what we see is a man without prejudices.
I could, say, use Roots of Brazil pair explain what happens in the country. Or Casa Grande & Senzala . If you step back a bit more to the story that the work is concerned, might reach the Owners of Power . But it would be too good to spend sailing people very, how shall I say?, alive. Vicentinho announced: "I'm scheduling a meeting with the Rector Heitor Pinto. I will ask that he withdraw this mistaken decision. Uniban The tidy should not have this confusion. I believe this has not gone through it. It must have been a decision by smaller instances" . Vicentinho, in short, to lend his friend to apologize to all essential PT: "I do not know."
Then the rector did not know? Yeah ... I knew he was connected to any entity that brings together private universities. I found out who is director of the National Association of Private Universities (Anup). Unable someone engaged in leading the entire industry to ignore what is happening inside your home. I entered the site of the entity and ... Well, I was amazed. Very much.
The first text I found there, until I saved a PDF to save as a curiosity, gives an account of the criticisms of the IGC Pinto, the general index of such a course, developed by MEC based on the examination of such Enade - proof which could be positive and that turned into a estrovenga Patrolwoman. He criticizes? So far, very well. Read excerpts of what goes on the site of an entity that brings together no less than universities:
To Heitor Pinto Filho, a director of ANUP, the index released by ECM this week is a political assessment. In an interview with Correio Brasiliense, the chancellor said the survey is poorly done because, among other things, does not include all institutions in the country.
According to Post Office field, the Rector Heitor lamented the non-participation of all HEIs in the evaluation, referring to the refusal of the USP and Unicamp not submit to SINAES. "Either everyone goes, or no," he said.
In the interview, the director of ANUP also defended a regionalized assessment respecting the characteristics of each state. "A country with the extent of Brazil can not have an index like this. We need specifics, "he noted.
COMMENT
Oh my Jesus Cristinho! It is not" sloppy "but rather" sloppy ", although this is not the worst evil done (pulled out the difference?) the language in such a short stretch. How to explain this, "referring to the refusal from USP and Unicamp not submit to SINAES. Note: USP and Unicamp not refused to NOT SUBMIT; they refused to SE SUBMIT.
Anup The proof takes cock in writing. I was also moved by the argument Pinto: the creation of the regional index. Or am I misunderstanding, or he is advocating that certain regions of the country can not compete with others. Let me see: a course in the region X could be C in the region Y, is it? I see ... Any chance of writing that is bold illiterate be considered correct in some region of the country? No!
What's up with the Brazilian university?
But back to the books there. Note that some care laws, institutions, civility, status, the four devil. Vicentinho was willing to settle the matter on the basis of personal relationships, friendship, intimacy. Here is part of Brazilian poverty - including the moral. I insist from day one: the issue is more serious than it seems. Lencioni Decio Machado, lord of the legal and stiff hair gel, the same as accusing Geisy granted interviews to show "intimate parts" for the innocent and the boys tried Uniban, took not found. Pinto said that made the decision "as an individual" . Wow! The highest authority of Uniban is not a president, but a "natural person". Maybe it's the understanding that there is "university autonomy". Machado is a member of the State Board of Education. Milton Linhares, vice-chancellor, is a member of the Board of Higher Education of the National Council of Education. We're done.
End of Silence
cowardly silence about that assault, I pointed out here since day one, was finally broken. Given the university's decision to expel Geisy, the Ministry of Education sent a request for information to Uniban, the Special Secretariat for Women's fired public prosecutors to investigate crimes against human rights, political parties, parliamentarians, OAB and UNE also spoken. I am pleased with the reaction, but I still point: they came late. The occurrence original was already extremely serious. It took the humiliation to come to the refinement that we agree.
revocation of the expulsion, moreover, did not stop the crimes that were committed in Uniban, and the perpetrators must be identified and punished. If the inquiry served to punish the victim, so syndication is not, but farce. The police enter the case. The prosecutor, now fired, do not even need the agreement of Geisy to act. Maybe not take to fix the Portuguese of Anup. But you can try to repair the morale of hooligans bent. Why not with the law?
To clarify
is clear that my criticisms do not extend to all students of Uniban. Those who did not participate that do not have to drive down to feel affected - and would be great, then, that the silent majority has not approved the lynching of a moral way of manifesting itself.
To conclude, I recall some one who adopts a principle is not impressed with the intervention of the surface. The mine, I said, believes that the stoning and the election of scapegoats are practices that should be banished from civilized behavior. Very little to me what will Geisy do next. Although it will pose nude, as some suggest - the implication seems to show the same prejudice that resulted in the action of the mob - this does not make it less stupid that those who participated catharsis of miseries. To think about the issue at its limit: the quality of the body does not change the stubborn spirit of a murderer. I reiterate: I find it indecent to speculate whether or not she cooperated with his captors.
Clearly, each situation involves a range of dress styles in a range of what is considered the propriety of a particular environment or occasion. I've told my students here who do not chew gum or was exhibiting armpit hair when I was teaching. I'll be the last to accept the MMA. Not anything goes, no, gentlemen! But candidates and lynch rapists have no authority to speak on decorum.
In the hierarchy of civilization, the criminal does not give lessons in morality to shame. This is good! They can spread. Too bad it does not give time to enter the next book.
PS - Hello, Anup! Time to take care of uncultured and beautiful on a site that brings together universities. For now, she lives there its early grave. How about aspiring to glory?
...
0 comments:
Post a Comment